Applause is a project led by the city of Ljubljana, Slovenia aiming to find solutions to invasive alien plant species (IAPS) in cities. Ljubljana is applying a zero-waste and circular economy principle to deal with these harmful plant species. Ljubljana is moving from a linear model for managing IAPS to a circular one that is valuable for the entire ecosystem. This process involves six steps: plant identification, biomass harvest, processing & storage, value recovery, final production, and new products & services to market. Through a variety of educational and awareness-raising actions, citizens are encouraged to participate in different stages of the Applause circular model. To do so, Ljubljana implements a participatory model that adapts to the needs and interests of different target groups.
Title
Brief description
Applause is a project led by the city of Ljubljana, Slovenia aiming to find solutions to invasive alien plant species (IAPS) in cities. Ljubljana is applying a zero-waste and circular economy principle to deal with these harmful plant species.
Ljubljana is moving from a linear model for managing IAPS to a circular one that is valuable for the entire ecosystem. This process involves six steps: plant identification, biomass harvest, processing & storage, value recovery, final production, and new products & services to market.
Through a variety of educational and awareness-raising actions, citizens are encouraged to participate in different stages of the Applause circular model. To do so, Ljubljana implements a participatory model that adapts to the needs and interests of different target groups.
Keywords
circular economy; zero-waste; city-led; IAPS
City/Country
Time period
Ongoing initiative
Lever(s)
Methodologies
World Region
Scale(s) of the case analysed
Target audience and dimension
Domain(s) of application
Context addressed
Solution applied
Challenge addressed/ Problem-led
Barriers addressed
Main Practices
Impact
Co benefits
Engagement Journey
Impact to climate neutrality
Applause draws awareness to the more unknown issue of IAPS. IAPS are detrimental to native biodiversity and can harm people’s health depending on the species. Instead of getting rid of these species, the project reuses materials that would otherwise be incinerated, using innovative approaches to create new materials out of it.
- Democratised decision-making & distributed agency
- Collective learning ability
- Collaborative action ability
The city recognises that in order to achieve climate neutrality people need to be involved and educated in the process to become invested. Through the participatory model, the project engages the public in the decision making process of how to deal with IAPS. They have also given the public three options on how to deal with them by either doing it by themselves and learning through educational materials, removing species together and learning in public workshops or leaving species at a collection point.
Context & Public policy of reference
Innovative approach(es) addressed
Applause identified the IAPS as a problem for the town, creating a decline in native biodiversity, environmental damage and potentially human health. Instead of continuing to incinerate or compost these plants, they have instead identified new ways to use the species through means such as plant processing to make paper, pest control, food, dyes, and hybrid coatings. To do this they are testing unconventional processes and techniques to process plants to paper and other products. For example, testing the concept of using waste liquid from IAPS in production of paper into raw materials for industrial purposes.
To identify IAPS, new approaches have been made to be more time efficient through the use of aerial and satellite imaging. The data that has been collected is on an open platform so many can contribute and also learn from the data.
In processing IAPS, Applause has put people's engagement at the center of the approach, highlighting the importance of engagement to create change. They have collaborated with universities, students, and citizens to take part in this zero-waste approach where people are gathering and creating new materials together. To engage citizens they have held 143 workshops with 2980 participants, 29 educational events, 3 festivals, posted 20 educational videos etc. to ensure that there is effective communication and engagement with the public and to raise awareness at different engagement levels.
Initiator
This initiative was started by the City of Ljubljana and co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund via Urban Innovative Actions.
Stakeholder networks and organisational model
As this was a people centred project, the citizens were the key stakeholders. The goal was to make them active participants in the project by raising awareness and increasing their participation in the project at three different engagement levels: DIY, join us, and collection points.
Democratic Purpose
Participant Recruitment
Interaction between participants
Resources
Key enablers
- Political: Promotion of circular economy and zero-waste principles. These principles helped towards the overall carbon-neutral goal by allowing for native plants to thrive without weeds.
- Social: Participation of citizens was the principal enabler of this project. Applause recognised the need for citizens as a core part of the project, as they are the ones who will benefit most. Through educational resources and workshops they were able to raise awareness of IAPS, bringing together the community to ensure that they could continue past this project to recognise IAPS and know what to do with them.
- Technical: There were two areas of technology that enabled this project: social media/internet and machines. Using social media such as youtube allowed for educational resources to be easily accessible for citizens. Machines were needed to process the IAPS and create the different products such as paper and dye.
Key inhibiting factors
Applause did not get as many people as they had hoped during the initial harvesting phase of IAPS, however, other than that it seems that there have been little inhibiting factors.
Drawbacks/pros/cons of the solutions (after implementation)
Scalability
The overall idea of the project can be used in other contexts, especially using citizen participation as a key part of the process. Raising awareness and using educational techniques should be fairly easy to transfer to other contexts.
This would most likely need to be used in a smaller community context rather than larger city based projects to ensure increased participation and the ability to provide educational support.
There would be a need to identify if an area needs/has significant issues with IAPS and if it does then they would need to adapt the plan to what IAPS there are. This would also mean that there would need to be research into whether the local IAPS can be similarly adapted/processed to create new products, perhaps with collaboration with local universities or research institutes.
Key lessons
Main positive lessons/opportunities identified
- Zero-waste + circular economy concepts were able to be applied to IAPS that would have otherwise been incinerated, creating a new purpose that is of use to the citizens who participated
- Centering citizens as the core stakeholders/audience of the project meant that they were educated about the issue and were able to get involved too
- Used a variety of educational tools to build awareness (such as, festivals, workshops, videos) on an often ignored issue
Main failures/barriers identified
- Participation in the harvesting phase of the six step process was less than hoped for
Comments ()