Name of Method
Brief description
Type/Level of Method
Challenges
The technique's simplicity, adaptability, and comprehensive approach make it simple to arrange a brainstorming or analytic session in a multitude of situations.
Problem, Purpose and Needs
The answers to the simple questions of the 5W technique will yield factual components that, once compiled, will allow for the creation of a universal representation of an event, interest, circumstance, or setting.
Relevance to Climate Neutrality
Challenges
Thematic Areas
Impact Goals
Issue Complexity
Issue Polarisation
Enabling Condition
Essential Considerations for Commissioning Authorities
The tool can support problem framing and context mapping activities.
Engagement Journey
Governance Models and Approaches
Enabling Conditions
Democratic Purpose
Spectrum of participation
Communication Channels
Actors and Stakeholder Relationships
The activity can be conducted with a strategy team, but it is most effective with stakeholders who have direct knowledge of or experience with an issue.
Participant Numbers
Actors and Stakeholders
Participant Recruitment
Interaction between participants
Format
Social Innovation Development Stage
Scope
Time commitment
A session employing the 5W technique can be run in one to two hours. However, the amount of time necessary to conduct the activity can be adjusted according to the level of detail needed. One might consider dedicating a considerable part of the session to discussing the different viewpoints.
Resources and Investments
Typical duration
Resources and Investments
In-house
Step by Step
Frame the questions by making them in line with the activity’s objectives.
Present the five questions to the participants and allow them to note down their response.
Discuss the outcomes and vote/highlight the replies and their most significant points.
Establish pertinent actions in respect to the crucial points.
N.B.: The questions can be changed to make it pertinent to whatever problem or issue is being addressed. The Ws help to cover all aspects of a problem so that a comprehensive solution can be found
Evaluation
Connecting Methods
The tool can be used altogether with other tools employed in the problem space for framing purposes, like for instance Problem Framing and the Frameboard or PESTEL analysis.
Flexibility and Adaptability
The tool's simplicity is highly valued, as it consists just of a list of questions to memorise and can be readily replicated and/or adapted to different situations. In addition, the tool does not require much preparation or other materials. Despite this, it can provide a comprehensive depiction of a situation because it seeks to gather a comprehensive and objective set of data.
Existing Guidelines and Best Practice
Szostak, R. (2003). Classifying natural and social scientific theories. Current Sociology, 51(1), 27-49.
References and Further Resources
Szostak, R. (2003). Classifying natural and social scientific theories. Current Sociology, 51(1), 27-49.
Σχόλια ()