Through crowdsourcing, Mexico City granted a voice and autonomy to the citizens to generate a new constitution. Online petitions, surveys, kiosks, general assemblies and data collection centres served as spaces to acquire these opinions and recommendations for a new constitution.
Title
Brief description
Through crowdsourcing, Mexico City (CDMX) granted a voice and autonomy to the citizens to generate a new constitution. Online petitions, surveys, kiosks, general assemblies and data collection centres served as spaces to acquire these opinions and recommendations for a new constitution.
Keywords
Crowdsourcing, citizenship building, petition, survey, constitution
City/Country
Time period
2016-2018
Lever(s)
Policy, Regulation& Governance
Culture, civic participation & Social Innovation
Capacity & Capability
Methodologies
Surveys- To gather people’s views on what they think their city looks like and what they would improve on. Available both online and offline, 26,000 full answers from residents. 1,474 neighbourhoods reached
Consitutional assembly- To approve the final draft of the constitutional assembly. 60% of the members were democratically elected
World Region
Scale(s) of the case analysed
Target audience and dimension
Domain(s) of application
Context addressed
Solution applied
Challenge addressed/ Problem-led approach
Barriers addressed
Main Practices
Impact
Co benefits
Engagement Journey
Impact to climate neutrality
A petition submitted on cleansing and the rescue of CDMX's rivers garnered more than 17,000 signatures, and it made it to the final text of the constitution. Part of the 20-year programmatic strategy Mexico City to recover its rivers and other bodies of water.
Context & Public policy of reference
Innovative approach(es) addressed
The mayor of Mexico City wanted to include the people of CDMX to contribute to a new constitution. Surveys, kiosk pop ups, volunteer data collectors, online petition sources, drafting committee and external events help by the people of CDMX helped develop the new constitution.
Then LabCDMX used Change.org to encourage ideas from people for the new constitution. Everyday citizens could create petitions.
Initiator
Mayor of Mexcio City, Mancera negotiated with the president and congressional leaders to adopt a new constitution, where the people give input and a committee (made up of ordinary people and experts) drafts the constitution.
Stakeholder networks and organisational model
Stakeholders:
a. Drafting group- Developed a first draft of the constitution
b. Residents of Mexico City- Provided input on online forums, data collection centres, community Citizen Assemblies, petitions, surveys,
c. LabCDMX Technology to implement surveys, kiosks, volunteers
d. Constitutional assembly- Approved the draft constitution
Network, governance and communication:
1. The mayor of Mexico City appointed 28 residents to a drafting committee which drafted the consitution.
i. At the beginning of constitutional drafting committee’s weekly sessions, LabCDMX provided an updated analysis of the survey, with charts and graphs summarising the results. An in-person report from the general counsel and other staff members was presented. These reports guided the group’s discussions.
2. City installed kiosks in highly trafficked public spaces, which reached people that, for whatever reason, weren’t able to participate in the Citizen Assemblies. Citizens could organise events related to the Constitution
i. Change.org petition: 427,815 supporters 26,040 Mexico City residents fully answered the survey, which comprised 82 percent of total respondents (the remainder reside in greater Mexico City or elsewhere in Mexico). The responses captured perspectives from 1,474 neighborhoods and 55 citizen-led events.
3. LabCDMX collected input from citizens in two ways. First it conducted a comprehensive survey on people imagining their city. The survey was available online and physically, where volunteers were in busy street corners, parks, entrances to subways. LabCDMX also installed a kiosk where there was no need for volunteers. At the kiosk, people could answer the survey using the tablet/paper.
4. A 100-member constitutional assembly (asamblea constituyente) was tasked to negotiate and approve the constitution document based on a draft provided by the mayor. 60 representatives were voted by Mexico City voters and 40 would be drawn from Congress, appointed by the mayor, or appointed by the president. But the mayor had no authority over this assembly once a draft text was released.
Democratic Purpose
Participant Recruitment
nteraction between participants
Resources
Key enablers
1. Had to account for the digital divide in the city, that’s why set up kiosks and data collection centres. Both online and offline survyes, meetings, assemblies to try and reach all people of CDMX.
2. Physical survey locations ran by volunteer students were approachable.
Key inhibiting factors
1. At the start it was difficult to engage people as they didn't have faith in the government and didn't believe the government was serious
--> There had been significant tension and disconnection between citizens and their government. Only 2% of the population trusted their government.
2. Collaborative editing (real-time interface to make changes in the text) was not the best tool to engage the citizens.
Drawbacks/pros/cons of the solutions (after implementation)
Scalability
Key lessons
Indicators
- On the Change.org petitions: 5000 signatures: sent to drafting committee’s legal experts for review. Signatures of over 5000 were incorporated to the constitution. 10,000 signatures: can formally present the ideas to the drafting committee. 50,000 signatures: audience with Mayor Mancera.
- But did not find resources that look at the successful indicators of this initiative.
External link
Cities of Service. (n.d.). Crowdsourcing a Constitution. Retrieved from https://citiesofservice.jhu.edu/resource/crowdsourcing-a-constitution-mexico-city/
GovLab. (n.d.). Constitución CDMX. Crowdsourcing Mexico City’s Constitution. Crowdlaw for Congress Series. Retrieved from https://congress.crowd.law/files/cdmx-case-study.pdf
Observatory of Public Sector Innovation. (n.d.). Crowdsourcing the Mexico City Constitution. Retrieved from https://oecd-opsi.org/innovations/crowdsourcing-the-mexico-city-constitution/
Participedia. (n.d.). Crowdsourcing a Constitution in Mexico City, Mexico (Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico). Retrieved from https://participedia.net/case/8089
Comments ()