Name of Method
Brief description
Type/Level of Method
Challenges
Problem, Purpose and Needs
The goal of co-production is to generate results that may be shared with all the actors. Examples of such results would be new ways to frame a problem, or new policies and visions. By bringing diverse actors together, co-production also results in new relationships. It can therefore mobilise and empower participants to create better cities and communities. Not only does co-production foster collaboration and partnership but it stimulates learning among diverse actors – these actors could be civil servants, citizens, urban planners, entrepreneurs, architects, scientists, or engineers. In a co-production model, they contribute to the design, implementation, and management of solutions together.
Relevance to Climate Neutrality
Challenges
Thematic Areas
Impact Goals
Issue Complexity
Issue Polarisation
Enabling Condition
Essential Considerations for Commissioning Authorities
Co-production addresses complex urban problems which have no quick fix. Because of this complexity, a diverse set of actors is needed to collaboratively design solutions that will respond to various needs. However, often, policy and planning leave little room for collaborative processes.
At a community level, the co-production process and its results need to be supported by the stakeholders – outreach and awareness activities such as PR campaigns or public events are important to achieve this. At a local government level, the co-production process should be built into existing strategic agendas and plans to foster connections and synergies so that the knowledge gained is available for future innovations.
Engagement Journey
Governance Models and Approaches
Enabling Conditions
Democratic Purpose
Spectrum of participation
Communication Channels
Actors and Stakeholder Relationships
Co-production allows for new relationships, partnerships and collaborations among actors who were previously not in contact with each other. It mobilises and empowers a diverse set of actors for joint solutions and action by also engaging the ‘unusual suspects’ in enhancing the ownership of and quality of solutions.
Moreover, co-production is seen as a way for bursting open departmental siloes within city governments and other local government agencies to facilitate the pooling of resources.
Participant Numbers
Actors and Stakeholders
Participant Recruitment
Interaction between participants
Format
Social Innovation Development Stage
Scope
Time commitment
Co-production processes are usually organised in cycles of sessions with a duration of four to six hours each. Duration is subject to the different issues that might be addressed when structuring the approach.
Resources and Investments
Typical duration
Resources and Investments
In-house
Step by Step
Step 1: Define the goals of the co-production process
It is important to define goals for the co-production process. Goals may include the development of new visions and strategies, concrete solutions, networks or partnerships and the empowerment of citizens. The goals influence who should be involved (which actors) and how the collaboration can be achieved (the tools used) in such a way as to empower the actors and produce shared results.
Step 2: Use the design principles to flesh out the co-production goals and structure
The design principles guide the approach to the co-production process by highlighting key considerations. For example, who should be involved, what type of knowledge is needed and what kind of results are sought. The principles also help to reflect on the process and results.
Step 3: Plan the co-production steps and activities
The steps in a co-production process are puzzle pieces which connect activities that need to happen to achieve the iterative goals of the co-production process. It is also important to identify and – as early as possible – reach out to the actors who need to be involved in each co-production step.
Step 4: Select the co-production tools
Specific co-production tools facilitate each step of the process towards desired goals. The choice of tools depends on the goals of the co-production process, on the specific co-production step and on the type of actors involved. After selecting the co-production tools, it is important to identify the materials, skills and other requirements needed to implement the tool.
Step 5: Reflect on the co-production process and results
Co-production processes are open processes and evolve over time as learning progresses. This requires continuous reflexivity, which helps to identify lessons learned and to adapt the process in light of changing objectives.
Evaluation
Those involved in co-production should be enabled to ask questions of the process along the way such as Which goals does the process aim to achieve? Is the process on the way to achieving these, or do we need adaptations? Reflexive monitoring can help to achieve reflexivity and evaluate the process in progress.
Three output design principles show what kind of results should be generated and evaluated by and in co-production:
1. Actionable knowledge for policy and planning ensures that the co-produced knowledge is immediately relevant and translated into policy and planning
2. Usable knowledge and empowerment ensure that the co-produced knowledge outputs are valuable to and taken up by many actors
3. Extending institutions for N-Synergies ensures that the coproduced knowledge connects to multiple goals, strategies, and agendas within the city. This helps to create synergies across sectors.
Connecting Methods
The European Union Horizon 2020 project SIC (Social Innovation Community): https://www.siceurope.eu/
and for the tools: https://www.silearning.eu/tools/
The European Union Interreg project MUSIC (Mitigation in Urban Areas: Solutions for Innovative Cities): https://drift.eur.nl/projects/music/,
the tools are in the guidance manual, see Roorda & Wittmayer (2014):
https://drift.eur.nl/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/DRIFT-Transition_management_in_the_urban_context-guidance_manual.pdf
Bound & Mulgan (2019):
https://www.nesta.org.uk/report/compendium-innovation-methods/
The collective action toolkit for social impact: https://www.frog.co/designmind/the-collective-action-toolkit-quick-start-guide?redirectbrand=frogdesign
Flexibility and Adaptability
Goals and objectives of co-production can vary in order and are iterative. It is important to identify the concrete co-production steps with a timeline of when these are going to happen. This is not meant to be a blueprint – it is likely that the process will need to change and adapt therefore it is important to allow for enough flexibility and time to do so.
Existing Guidelines and Best Practice
https://www.silearning.eu/tools/
https://connectingnature.eu/sites/default/files/downloads/First%20version%20Co%20Production%20guidebook%2030%20Aug%202020.pdf
References and Further Resources
https://connectingnature.eu/sites/default/files/downloads/First%20version%20Co%20Production%20guidebook%2030%20Aug%202020.pdf
https://drift.eur.nl/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/DRIFT-Transition_management_in_the_urban_context-guidance_manual.pdf
https://www.frog.co/designmind/the-collective-action-toolkit-quick-start-guide?redirectbrand=frogdesign
https://www.nesta.org.uk/report/compendium-innovation-methods/
https://www.silearning.eu/tools/
Bound, K., & Mulgan, G. (2019). A compendium of innovation methods.
Roorda, C., & Wittmayer, J. (2014). Transition management in five European cities–an evaluation. DRIFT, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam.
Comments ()